During the high-profile sex trafficking trial of Sean “Diddy” Combs, a former assistant identified only as “Mia” delivered explosive testimony detailing years of alleged sexual and physical abuse at the hands of the music mogul.
Her eight-year tenure working for Combs allegedly subjected her to a pattern of unwanted sexual advances, forced sexual acts, and physical intimidation that prosecutors argue exemplifies the environment of control central to their case.
Mia’s testimony described multiple incidents where Combs allegedly touched her without consent, including putting his hand up her dress against her will. More severe allegations followed, with claims that Combs forced her to perform oral sex and, on at least one occasion, climbed into her bed to initiate non-consensual intercourse.
The victim detailed escalating violations, from unwanted touching to forced sexual acts that prosecutors say demonstrate a pattern of abuse.
The jury listened intently as she recounted instances of physical abuse, including having her arm slammed in a door, being thrown into a swimming pool, and having ice water dumped over her head as punitive measures.
The court has been presented with substantial corroborating evidence, including videos of what prosecutors describe as “freak-offs” – drug-fueled sex parties allegedly orchestrated by Combs.
These recordings, which prosecutors suggest were kept as potential blackmail material, show Combs monitoring multiple women during sexual acts. Material evidence recovered from Combs’ hotel suite included lubricants, baby oil, and a pink powder that tested positive for ecstasy.
Former girlfriend Cassie Ventura‘s earlier testimony aligned with themes of control and intimidation, describing her fear that compromising videos might be released.
The defense has maintained that participation in these recorded encounters was voluntary, challenging the prosecution’s narrative of coercion.
The trial has revealed a complex web of interpersonal dynamics, with witnesses describing an environment where professional opportunities were intertwined with compliance to Combs’ demands.
Prosecutors have suggested that a $100,000 bribe was allegedly paid to suppress hotel security footage showing an assault, further illustrating the lengths to which Combs allegedly went to maintain control over those in his orbit.
The trial continues with additional witnesses expected in the coming days, with the prosecution planning to call a former college basketball player who worked as Combs’ personal assistant before resting their case. Brendan Paul, who earned a salary of $100,000, testified about purchasing drugs for Combs and assisting with set-up for these alleged “Wild King nights.”
