Metalcore veterans Hatebreed have vehemently denied allegations brought forth in a lawsuit filed by former bassist Chris Beattie, who initiated legal proceedings against the band on July 30, 2025, in Connecticut Superior Court.
The band, through frontman Jamey Jasta, characterized Beattie’s claims as a “bitter betrayal” of their 20-plus years of friendship and professional collaboration.
Beattie’s lawsuit alleges unpaid profits, unfair dismissal, and lack of financial transparency following his removal from the band in November 2024. The bassist, who along with Jasta was one of only two remaining original members, claims he is entitled to 25% of the band’s revenue as per their longstanding profit-sharing agreement.
Former bassist seeks 25% of band revenue per agreement, citing financial misconduct after 2024 dismissal.
Beattie further asserts that his image continues to be used in promotional materials despite his dismissal.
Jasta, who manages the band alongside Steve Ross, issued a statement yesterday addressing the allegations: “These claims misrepresent our business practices and the circumstances of Chris’s departure. We’ve always operated with integrity and transparency.”
The statement significantly avoided mentioning specific allegations regarding Jasta’s allegedly erratic behavior, which Beattie highlighted in court documents.
The legal battle has already sparked significant reaction across social media platforms, with fans divided in their support.
Industry analysts suggest this dispute could potentially establish precedent for similar conflicts within established bands, particularly regarding ownership rights and profit distribution in long-running musical groups.
Financial aspects of the lawsuit include claims for compensatory damages and emotional distress, with Beattie specifically citing merchandise sales revenue and touring profits as areas where he believes he was shortchanged. Matt Bachand from Shadows Fall has since taken over bass duties for the band.
The band has countered that Beattie’s removal was justified and that all financial obligations were properly fulfilled.
While Beattie has expressed hope for an amicable resolution, Hatebreed’s aggressive response suggests the case may proceed to trial.
The court documents reveal Beattie is also seeking compensation for potential sync licensing revenue from the band’s music used in commercials and video games that he claims he never received.
The band has continued performing with a replacement bassist and is scheduled to begin recording their next album in September, raising questions about how the lawsuit might affect their creative output and industry standing moving forward.
Beattie maintains he was a co-owner and contributor to Hatebreed’s distinctive sound throughout his 30-year tenure with the band.
Legal experts note that performance royalties could become a central issue, as musicians typically receive payments through performance rights organizations when their music is publicly performed.
